Acer - Predator X32 X3 vs Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE
Between the Predator X32 X3 and UltraSharp U2725QE, the Predator X32 X3 comes out ahead in peak brightness and refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U2725QE wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Predator X32 X3 scores 73.2 and the UltraSharp U2725QE scores 60.3 on our Mars Score.
Welches solltest du kaufen?
The Predator X32 X3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Predator X32 X3 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.
Pick the UltraSharp U2725QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Predator X32 X3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Warum Acer - Predator X32 X3 gewinnt
- ▲Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Warum Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE gewinnt
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 55.56% more. 140 W vs 90 W.
Spec-Vergleich
Panel
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 450 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 W | 140 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Häufig gefragt
Which has higher refresh rate, Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U2725QE?+
Predator X32 X3 refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U2725QE?+
Predator X32 X3 responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U2725QE have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on Predator X32 X3, 140W on UltraSharp U2725QE.
Spec-Detailanalysen
Mehr von denselben Marken
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.