Between the Predator X32 X3 and ProArt PA32UCXR, the Predator X32 X3 comes out ahead in refresh rate and response time (gtg), while the ProArt PA32UCXR wins on peak brightness and usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Predator X32 X3 scores 73.2 and the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Predator X32 X3 edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 65.4), but the 7.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Predator X32 X3 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, response time (gtg), dci-p3 coverage, among others.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable screen size, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Predator X32 X3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Acer - Predator X32 X3 wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 60.00% more. 1600 nits vs 1000 nits.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 6.67% more. 96 W vs 90 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1600 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 3lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 W | 96 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Predator X32 X3 or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
Predator X32 X3 refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, Predator X32 X3 or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
Predator X32 X3 responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does Predator X32 X3 or ProArt PA32UCXR have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on Predator X32 X3, 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.