Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nothing - CMF Phone 1 vs Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
CMF Phone 1NOTHINGRENDER
Probe A
Nothing
CMF Phone 1
61.4/ 100C
Performance47· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X Fold 3 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X Fold 3 Pro
73.1/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery71· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the CMF Phone 1 and X Fold 3 Pro, the CMF Phone 1 comes out ahead in weight, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the CMF Phone 1 scores 61.4 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X Fold 3 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 11.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the CMF Phone 1 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight.

Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, ram, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X Fold 3 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Nothing - CMF Phone 1 wins

  • Weight — 39.00 g less. 197 vs 236.

Why Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro wins

  • AnTuTu — 269.64% more. 2070000 vs 560000.
  • Wired charging — 203.03% more. 100 W vs 33 W.
  • RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
  • Screen size — 20.39% more. 8.03 " vs 6.67 ".
  • Battery capacity — 14.00% more. 5700 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
  • Pixel density — 1.77% more. 402 ppi vs 395 ppi.
  • Has Optical image stabilization.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Weight197 glead236 g
Thickness8.2 mmlead11.2 mm
Water resistanceIP52IPX8lead
Form factorbarfoldable_booklead

Display

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Screen size6.67 "8.03 "lead
Pixel density395 ppi402 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2000 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
RAM8 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu5600002070000lead
CPU total clock9.0 GHz21.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera16 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationfalsetruelead

Battery

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Battery capacity5000 mAh5700 mAhlead
Wired charging33 W100 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W50 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slottrueleadfalse

Operating System

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates2 years4 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, CMF Phone 1 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro has 14.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5700 mAh.

Which is lighter, CMF Phone 1 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

CMF Phone 1 is 39g lighter — 197g vs 236g.

Is CMF Phone 1 waterproof?+

CMF Phone 1 has an IP52 rating.

Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, CMF Phone 1 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, CMF Phone 1 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.