Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy S26 vs Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy S26SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy S26
64.6/ 100C
Performance71· 25%
Battery50· 20%
Display65· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
iPhone 17 Pro MaxAPPLERENDER
Probe B
Apple
iPhone 17 Pro Max
67.5/ 100C
Performance70· 25%
Battery59· 20%
Display72· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy S26 and iPhone 17 Pro Max, the Galaxy S26 comes out ahead in weight and wired charging, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max wins on wireless charging and battery capacity. Overall, the Galaxy S26 scores 64.6 and the iPhone 17 Pro Max scores 67.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (64.6 vs 67.5). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Galaxy S26 if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, wired charging, main camera, among others.

Pick the iPhone 17 Pro Max if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, battery capacity, screen size, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Samsung - Galaxy S26 wins

  • Weight — 59.00 g less. 168 vs 227.
  • Wired charging — 50.00% more. 45 W vs 30 W.
  • Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
  • AnTuTu — 2.38% more. 2150000 vs 2100000.
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 6).

Why Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max wins

  • Wireless charging — 66.67% more. 25 W vs 15 W.
  • Battery capacity — 17.13% more. 4685 mAh vs 4000 mAh.
  • Screen size — 11.29% more. 6.9 " vs 6.2 ".
  • Pixel density — 8.24% more. 460 ppi vs 425 ppi.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max
Weight168 glead227 g
Thickness7.4 mmlead8.3 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max
Screen size6.2 "6.9 "lead
Pixel density425 ppi460 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2400 nitslead2200 nits

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu2150000lead2100000
CPU total clock22.0 GHzlead20.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max
Main camera50 MPlead48 MP
Front camera12 MP12 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max
Battery capacity4000 mAh4685 mAhlead
Wired charging45 Wlead30 W
Wireless charging15 W25 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max
OSAndroidiOSlead
Promised OS updates7 yearslead6 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 Pro Max?+

iPhone 17 Pro Max has 17.1% more battery — 4000 mAh vs 4685 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 Pro Max?+

Galaxy S26 is 59g lighter — 168g vs 227g.

Is Galaxy S26 waterproof?+

Galaxy S26 has an IP68 rating.

Does iPhone 17 Pro Max support 5G?+

Yes, iPhone 17 Pro Max supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 Pro Max?+

Galaxy S26 has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.