Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - iPhone 16 vs Vivo - X200

Last updated · How Mars Score works
iPhone 16APPLERENDER
Probe A
Apple
iPhone 16
57.4/ 100D
Performance61· 25%
Battery44· 20%
Display53· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200VIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200
71.7/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the iPhone 16 and X200, the iPhone 16 comes out ahead in weight and promised os updates, while the X200 wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 16 scores 57.4 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X200 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the iPhone 16 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, promised os updates.

Pick the X200 if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, refresh rate, among others.

Both ship with comparable 5g support, water resistance, pixel density, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Apple - iPhone 16 wins

  • Weight — 32.00 g less. 170 vs 202.
  • Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).

Why Vivo - X200 wins

  • Wired charging — 350.00% more. 90 W vs 20 W.
  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 120 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • Wireless charging — 100.00% more. 30 W vs 15 W.
  • Battery capacity — 62.88% more. 5800 mAh vs 3561 mAh.
  • AnTuTu — 61.73% more. 2620000 vs 1620000.
  • RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Screen size — 9.34% more. 6.67 " vs 6.1 ".
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecApple - iPhone 16Vivo - X200
Weight170 glead202 g
Thickness7.8 mmlead8.0 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecApple - iPhone 16Vivo - X200
Screen size6.1 "6.67 "lead
Pixel density460 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hzlead
Peak brightness2000 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecApple - iPhone 16Vivo - X200
RAM8 GB12 GBlead
Storage128 GB256 GBlead
AnTuTu16200002620000lead
CPU total clock17.0 GHz22.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecApple - iPhone 16Vivo - X200
Main camera48 MP50 MPlead
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecApple - iPhone 16Vivo - X200
Battery capacity3561 mAh5800 mAhlead
Wired charging20 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecApple - iPhone 16Vivo - X200
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecApple - iPhone 16Vivo - X200
OSiOSleadAndroid
Promised OS updates5 yearslead4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, iPhone 16 or X200?+

X200 has 62.9% more battery — 3561 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, iPhone 16 or X200?+

iPhone 16 is 32g lighter — 170g vs 202g.

Is iPhone 16 waterproof?+

iPhone 16 has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 support 5G?+

Yes, X200 supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, iPhone 16 or X200?+

X200 offers 12GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, iPhone 16 or X200?+

X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.