Between the iPhone 17 Pro Max and X200, the iPhone 17 Pro Max comes out ahead in screen size and promised os updates, while the X200 wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 17 Pro Max scores 67.5 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 edges ahead on the Mars Score (67.5 vs 71.7), but the 4.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the iPhone 17 Pro Max if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are screen size, promised os updates.
Pick the X200 if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, weight, among others.
Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max wins
- ▲Screen size — 3.45% more. 6.9 " vs 6.67 ".
- ▲Promised OS updates: 6 (vs 4).
Why Vivo - X200 wins
- ▲Wired charging — 200.00% more. 90 W vs 30 W.
- ▲Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- ▲Weight — 25.00 g less. 202 vs 227.
- ▲AnTuTu — 24.76% more. 2620000 vs 2100000.
- ▲Battery capacity — 23.80% more. 5800 mAh vs 4685 mAh.
- ▲Wireless charging — 20.00% more. 30 W vs 25 W.
- ▲Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 227 g | 202 glead |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.0 mmlead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IP68 |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.9 "lead | 6.67 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2200 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 48 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4685 mAh | 5800 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 30 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 25 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | iOSlead | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 6 yearslead | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, iPhone 17 Pro Max or X200?+
X200 has 23.8% more battery — 4685 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, iPhone 17 Pro Max or X200?+
X200 is 25g lighter — 227g vs 202g.
Is iPhone 17 Pro Max waterproof?+
iPhone 17 Pro Max has an IP68 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, iPhone 17 Pro Max or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.