Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - iPhone 17 vs Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra

Last updated · How Mars Score works
iPhone 17APPLERENDER
Probe A
Apple
iPhone 17
61.7/ 100C
Performance65· 25%
Battery46· 20%
Display66· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Razr 50 UltraMOTOROLARENDER
Probe B
Motorola
Razr 50 Ultra
65.6/ 100C
Performance64· 25%
Battery50· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the iPhone 17 and Razr 50 Ultra, the iPhone 17 comes out ahead in wireless charging and antutu, while the Razr 50 Ultra wins on front camera and wired charging. Overall, the iPhone 17 scores 61.7 and the Razr 50 Ultra scores 65.6 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead on the Mars Score (61.7 vs 65.6), but the 3.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the iPhone 17 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are wireless charging, antutu, pixel density, among others.

Pick the Razr 50 Ultra if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, wired charging, ram, among others.

Both ship with comparable 5g support, optical image stabilization, headphone jack, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Apple - iPhone 17 wins

  • Wireless charging — 66.67% more. 25 W vs 15 W.
  • AnTuTu — 22.98% more. 1980000 vs 1610000.
  • Pixel density — 11.38% more. 460 ppi vs 413 ppi.
  • Promised OS updates: 6 (vs 3).

Why Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra wins

  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Wired charging — 66.67% more. 45 W vs 27 W.
  • RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Screen size — 9.52% more. 6.9 " vs 6.3 ".
  • Battery capacity — 8.34% more. 4000 mAh vs 3692 mAh.
  • Weight — 5.00 g less. 189 vs 194.
  • Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecApple - iPhone 17Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
Weight194 g189 glead
Thickness8.1 mm7.1 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IPX8lead
Form factorbarfoldable_clamshelllead

Display

SpecApple - iPhone 17Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
Screen size6.3 "6.9 "lead
Pixel density460 ppilead413 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hzlead
Peak brightness2200 nits3000 nitslead

Performance

SpecApple - iPhone 17Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
RAM8 GB12 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu1980000lead1610000
CPU total clock19.2 GHzlead16.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecApple - iPhone 17Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
Main camera48 MP50 MPlead
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecApple - iPhone 17Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
Battery capacity3692 mAh4000 mAhlead
Wired charging27 W45 Wlead
Wireless charging25 Wlead15 W

Connectivity

SpecApple - iPhone 17Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecApple - iPhone 17Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
OSiOSleadAndroid
Promised OS updates6 yearslead3 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, iPhone 17 or Razr 50 Ultra?+

Razr 50 Ultra has 8.3% more battery — 3692 mAh vs 4000 mAh.

Which is lighter, iPhone 17 or Razr 50 Ultra?+

Razr 50 Ultra is 5g lighter — 194g vs 189g.

Is iPhone 17 waterproof?+

iPhone 17 has an IP68 rating.

Does Razr 50 Ultra support 5G?+

Yes, Razr 50 Ultra supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, iPhone 17 or Razr 50 Ultra?+

Razr 50 Ultra offers 12GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, iPhone 17 or Razr 50 Ultra?+

Razr 50 Ultra has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.