Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Vivo - iQOO 13 vs Nothing - Phone (3)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
iQOO 13VIVORENDER
Probe A
Vivo
iQOO 13
75.3/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery76· 20%
Display75· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Phone (3)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe B
Nothing
Phone (3)
68.7/ 100B
Performance71· 25%
Battery64· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the iQOO 13 and Phone (3), the iQOO 13 comes out ahead in wired charging and antutu, while the Phone (3) wins on weight and promised os updates. Overall, the iQOO 13 scores 75.3 and the Phone (3) scores 68.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The iQOO 13 edges ahead on the Mars Score (75.3 vs 68.7), but the 6.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the iQOO 13 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are wired charging, antutu, ram, among others.

Pick the Phone (3) if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, promised os updates, wireless charging.

Both ship with comparable main camera, 5g support, front camera, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the iQOO 13 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Vivo - iQOO 13 wins

  • Wired charging — 84.62% more. 120 W vs 65 W.
  • AnTuTu — 37.56% more. 2820000 vs 2050000.
  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • Refresh rate — 20.00% more. 144 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Battery capacity — 19.42% more. 6150 mAh vs 5150 mAh.
  • Pixel density — 10.87% more. 510 ppi vs 460 ppi.
  • Screen size — 1.79% more. 6.82 " vs 6.7 ".
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP68).

Why Nothing - Phone (3) wins

  • Weight — 17.00 g less. 196 vs 213.
  • Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
  • Wireless charging: 15 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Nothing - Phone (3)
Weight213 g196 glead
Thickness8.13 mmlead8.4 mm
Water resistanceIP69leadIP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Nothing - Phone (3)
Screen size6.82 "lead6.7 "
Pixel density510 ppilead460 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hzlead120 Hz
Peak brightness4500 nits4500 nits

Performance

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Nothing - Phone (3)
RAM16 GBlead12 GB
Storage512 GBlead256 GB
AnTuTu2820000lead2050000
CPU total clock22.6 GHzlead21.6 GHz

Cameras

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Nothing - Phone (3)
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera32 MP32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Nothing - Phone (3)
Battery capacity6150 mAhlead5150 mAh
Wired charging120 Wlead65 W
Wireless charging0 W15 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Nothing - Phone (3)
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecVivo - iQOO 13Nothing - Phone (3)
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates4 years5 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, iQOO 13 or Phone (3)?+

iQOO 13 has 19.4% more battery — 6150 mAh vs 5150 mAh.

Which is lighter, iQOO 13 or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) is 17g lighter — 213g vs 196g.

Is iQOO 13 waterproof?+

iQOO 13 has an IP69 rating.

Does Phone (3) support 5G?+

Yes, Phone (3) supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, iQOO 13 or Phone (3)?+

iQOO 13 offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, iQOO 13 or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.