Between the Atlantis Mini Pro and X2V2 Mini, the Atlantis Mini Pro comes out ahead in weight, while the X2V2 Mini wins on polling rate. Overall, the Atlantis Mini Pro scores 79.4 and the X2V2 Mini scores 86.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2V2 Mini edges ahead on the Mars Score (79.4 vs 86.7), but the 7.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Atlantis Mini Pro if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight.
Pick the X2V2 Mini if you care most about polling rate. Its strongest claims are polling rate.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, wireless, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X2V2 Mini is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro wins
- ▲Weight — 3.00 g less. 49 vs 52.
Why Pulsar - X2V2 Mini wins
- ▲Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 49 glead | 52 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 70 h | 70 h |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.