Miele - Triflex HX2 Pro vs Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H
Between the Triflex HX2 Pro and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the Triflex HX2 Pro comes out ahead in battery and suction (aw), while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on dustbin and weight. Overall, the Triflex HX2 Pro scores 76.7 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Triflex HX2 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (76.7 vs 70.7), but the 6.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Triflex HX2 Pro if you care most about battery and suction (aw). The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, suction (aw).
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are dustbin, weight.
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Triflex HX2 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Miele - Triflex HX2 Pro wins
- ▲Battery — 100.00% more. 120 min vs 60 min.
- ▲Suction (AW) — 14.29% more. 200 vs 175.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Dustbin — 40.00% more. 0.7 L vs 0.5 L.
- ▲Weight — 0.40 kg less. 3.5 vs 3.9.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Miele - Triflex HX2 Pro | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 200lead | 175 |
| Dustbin | 0.5 L | 0.7 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Miele - Triflex HX2 Pro | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.9 kg | 3.5 kglead |
| Battery | 120 minlead | 60 min |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.