Skip to content
vsMars
Direktvergleich

Oppo - Find X8 vs Vivo - X200 Pro

Zuletzt aktualisiert · Wie der Mars Score funktioniert
Find X8OPPORENDER
Probe A
Oppo
Find X8
70.9/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery70· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Schnelles Urteil

Between the Find X8 and X200 Pro, the Find X8 comes out ahead in wireless charging and weight, while the X200 Pro wins on ram and wired charging. Overall, the Find X8 scores 70.9 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.

Kaufberatung

Welches solltest du kaufen?

The X200 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.9 vs 74), but the 3.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Find X8 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are wireless charging, weight, pixel density, among others.

Pick the X200 Pro if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are ram, wired charging, battery capacity, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Warum Oppo - Find X8 gewinnt

  • Wireless charging — 66.67% more. 50 W vs 30 W.
  • Weight — 30.00 g less. 193 vs 223.
  • Pixel density — 1.77% more. 460 ppi vs 452 ppi.
  • Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).

Warum Vivo - X200 Pro gewinnt

  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • Wired charging — 12.50% more. 90 W vs 80 W.
  • Battery capacity — 6.57% more. 6000 mAh vs 5630 mAh.
  • AnTuTu — 6.20% more. 2740000 vs 2580000.
  • Screen size — 2.88% more. 6.78 " vs 6.59 ".
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP68).
Komplette Daten

Spec-Vergleich

Design

SpecOppo - Find X8Vivo - X200 Pro
Weight193 glead223 g
Thickness7.85 mmlead8.5 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP69lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecOppo - Find X8Vivo - X200 Pro
Screen size6.59 "6.78 "lead
Pixel density460 ppilead452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4500 nits4500 nits

Performance

SpecOppo - Find X8Vivo - X200 Pro
RAM12 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu25800002740000lead
CPU total clock22.4 GHz23.2 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecOppo - Find X8Vivo - X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera32 MP32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecOppo - Find X8Vivo - X200 Pro
Battery capacity5630 mAh6000 mAhlead
Wired charging80 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging50 Wlead30 W

Connectivity

SpecOppo - Find X8Vivo - X200 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecOppo - Find X8Vivo - X200 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates5 yearslead4 years
Leserfragen

Häufig gefragt

Which has better battery, Find X8 or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has 6.6% more battery — 5630 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, Find X8 or X200 Pro?+

Find X8 is 30g lighter — 193g vs 223g.

Is Find X8 waterproof?+

Find X8 has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Find X8 or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Find X8 or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Im Detail

Spec-Detailanalysen

Nach Hersteller

Mehr von denselben Marken

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.