ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR vs Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)
Between the ProArt PA32UCXR and Studio Display (Nano-texture), the ProArt PA32UCXR comes out ahead in peak brightness and refresh rate, while the Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins on dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 and the Studio Display (Nano-texture) scores 56.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The ProArt PA32UCXR is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.
Pick the Studio Display (Nano-texture) if you care most about dci-p3 coverage. Its strongest claims are dci-p3 coverage.
Both ship with comparable panel type, usb-c power delivery, g-sync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the ProArt PA32UCXR is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 166.67% more. 1600 nits vs 600 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 120 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 37.50% less. 5 ms vs 8 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲Has FreeSync.
Why Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 5Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hzlead | 60 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 5 mslead | 8 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1600 nitslead | 600 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | truelead | false |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 3lead | 0 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1lead | 0 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 96 W | 96 W |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ProArt PA32UCXR or Studio Display (Nano-texture)?+
ProArt PA32UCXR refreshes at 120Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, ProArt PA32UCXR or Studio Display (Nano-texture)?+
ProArt PA32UCXR responds in 5ms vs 8ms.
Does ProArt PA32UCXR or Studio Display (Nano-texture) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR, 96W on Studio Display (Nano-texture).
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.