Between the X2H Mini and X2V2 Mini, the X2H Mini comes out ahead in max dpi, while the X2V2 Mini wins on weight. Overall, the X2H Mini scores 88.2 and the X2V2 Mini scores 86.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (88.2 vs 86.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the X2H Mini if you care most about max dpi. The biggest gaps in its favor are max dpi.
Pick the X2V2 Mini if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, wireless, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Pulsar - X2H Mini wins
- ▲Max DPI — 23.08% more. 32000 vs 26000.
Why Pulsar - X2V2 Mini wins
- ▲Weight — 1.00 g less. 52 vs 53.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 32000lead | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 750lead | 650 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 53 g | 52 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 70 h | 70 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.