Between the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) and XR-4, the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) comes out ahead in standalone, while the XR-4 wins on field of view. Overall, the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) scores 61.1 and the XR-4 scores 68.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The XR-4 edges ahead on the Mars Score (61.1 vs 68.3), but the 7.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if you care most about standalone. The biggest gaps in its favor are standalone.
Pick the XR-4 if you care most about field of view. Its strongest claims are field of view.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, eye tracking, color passthrough, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the XR-4 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins
- ▲Standalone: true (vs false).
Why Varjo - XR-4 wins
- ▲Field of view — 9.09% more. 120 ° vs 110 °.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) | Varjo - XR-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 3552x3840 | 3840x3744 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Field of view | 110 ° | 120 °lead |
| Panelⓘ | Micro-OLED | Micro-OLED |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) | Varjo - XR-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | true | true |
| Face tracking | truelead | false |
| Color passthrough | true | true |
Compute
| Spec | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) | Varjo - XR-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | truelead | false |
| Battery | 2.5 hlead | 0 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.