Between the TK860i and CineBeam Q (HU710PB), the TK860i comes out ahead in brightness, while the CineBeam Q (HU710PB) wins on light source. Overall, the TK860i scores 84.6 and the CineBeam Q (HU710PB) scores 35 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The TK860i is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 49.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the TK860i if you care most about brightness. The biggest gaps in its favor are brightness.
Pick the CineBeam Q (HU710PB) if you care most about light source. Its strongest claims are light source.
Both ship with comparable resolution, short-throw, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the TK860i is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why BenQ - TK860i wins
- ▲Brightness — 560.00% more. 3300 lm vs 500 lm.
Why LG - CineBeam Q (HU710PB) wins
- ▲Light source: Laser (vs Lamp).
Spec comparison
Image
| Spec | BenQ - TK860i | LG - CineBeam Q (HU710PB) |
|---|---|---|
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Brightness | 3300 lmlead | 500 lm |
| Contrast | 600000:1 | 450000:1 |
| Light source | Lamp | Laserlead |
| Short-throw | false | false |
Smart & Connectivity
| Spec | BenQ - TK860i | LG - CineBeam Q (HU710PB) |
|---|---|---|
| Smart OS | Android TV | webOS |
| HDMI inputs | 2lead | 1 |
| Built-in speakers | true | true |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.