Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nothing - CMF Phone 1 vs Nothing - Phone (2)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
CMF Phone 1NOTHINGRENDER
Probe A
Nothing
CMF Phone 1
61.4/ 100C
Performance47· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Phone (2)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe B
Nothing
Phone (2)
64.5/ 100C
Performance61· 25%
Battery59· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the CMF Phone 1 and Phone (2), the CMF Phone 1 comes out ahead in battery capacity and weight, while the Phone (2) wins on antutu and front camera. Overall, the CMF Phone 1 scores 61.4 and the Phone (2) scores 64.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Phone (2) edges ahead on the Mars Score (61.4 vs 64.5), but the 3.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the CMF Phone 1 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery capacity, weight, pixel density.

Pick the Phone (2) if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are antutu, front camera, ram, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Nothing - CMF Phone 1 wins

  • Battery capacity — 6.38% more. 5000 mAh vs 4700 mAh.
  • Weight — 4.20 g less. 197 vs 201.2.
  • Pixel density — 0.25% more. 395 ppi vs 394 ppi.

Why Nothing - Phone (2) wins

  • AnTuTu — 130.36% more. 1290000 vs 560000.
  • Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
  • RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Wired charging — 36.36% more. 45 W vs 33 W.
  • Has Optical image stabilization.
  • Water resistance: IP54 (vs IP52).
  • Promised OS updates: 3 (vs 2).
  • Screen size — 0.45% more. 6.7 " vs 6.67 ".
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (2)
Weight197 glead201.2 g
Thickness8.2 mmlead8.6 mm
Water resistanceIP52IP54lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (2)
Screen size6.67 "6.7 "lead
Pixel density395 ppilead394 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2000 nitslead1600 nits

Performance

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (2)
RAM8 GB12 GBlead
Storage256 GB256 GB
AnTuTu5600001290000lead
CPU total clock9.0 GHz14.6 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (2)
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera16 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationfalsetruelead

Battery

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (2)
Battery capacity5000 mAhlead4700 mAh
Wired charging33 W45 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W15 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (2)
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slottrueleadfalse

Operating System

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (2)
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates2 years3 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (2)?+

CMF Phone 1 has 6.4% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 4700 mAh.

Which is lighter, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (2)?+

CMF Phone 1 is 4g lighter — 197g vs 201.2g.

Is CMF Phone 1 waterproof?+

CMF Phone 1 has an IP52 rating.

Does Phone (2) support 5G?+

Yes, Phone (2) supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (2)?+

Phone (2) offers 12GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (2)?+

Phone (2) has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.