Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy A36 vs Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy A36SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy A36
61.5/ 100C
Performance47· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X Fold 3 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X Fold 3 Pro
73.1/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery71· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy A36 and X Fold 3 Pro, the Galaxy A36 comes out ahead in weight and promised os updates, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on antutu and front camera. Overall, the Galaxy A36 scores 61.5 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X Fold 3 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 11.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Galaxy A36 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, promised os updates.

Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are antutu, front camera, wired charging, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X Fold 3 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Samsung - Galaxy A36 wins

  • Weight — 41.00 g less. 195 vs 236.
  • Promised OS updates: 6 (vs 4).

Why Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro wins

  • AnTuTu — 223.44% more. 2070000 vs 640000.
  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Wired charging — 122.22% more. 100 W vs 45 W.
  • RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Screen size — 19.85% more. 8.03 " vs 6.7 ".
  • Battery capacity — 14.00% more. 5700 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
  • Pixel density — 4.42% more. 402 ppi vs 385 ppi.
  • Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP67).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Weight195 glead236 g
Thickness7.4 mmlead11.2 mm
Water resistanceIP67IPX8lead
Form factorbarfoldable_booklead

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Screen size6.7 "8.03 "lead
Pixel density385 ppi402 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1900 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
RAM8 GB16 GBlead
Storage128 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu6400002070000lead
CPU total clock8.4 GHz21.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Battery capacity5000 mAh5700 mAhlead
Wired charging45 W100 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W50 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy A36Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates6 yearslead4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy A36 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro has 14.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5700 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy A36 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

Galaxy A36 is 41g lighter — 195g vs 236g.

Is Galaxy A36 waterproof?+

Galaxy A36 has an IP67 rating.

Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Galaxy A36 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy A36 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.