Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Oppo - Reno 13 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy S25 UltraSAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy S25 Ultra
73.9/ 100B
Performance71· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display72· 18%
Cameras92· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Reno 13 ProOPPORENDER
Probe B
Oppo
Reno 13 Pro
68.3/ 100B
Performance62· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display71· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy S25 Ultra and Reno 13 Pro, the Galaxy S25 Ultra comes out ahead in main camera and antutu, while the Reno 13 Pro wins on front camera and wired charging. Overall, the Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 73.9 and the Reno 13 Pro scores 68.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Galaxy S25 Ultra edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.9 vs 68.3), but the 5.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Galaxy S25 Ultra if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are main camera, antutu, pixel density, among others.

Pick the Reno 13 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, wired charging, weight, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Galaxy S25 Ultra is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Samsung - Galaxy S25 Ultra wins

  • Main camera — 300.00% more. 200 MP vs 50 MP.
  • AnTuTu — 50.35% more. 2150000 vs 1430000.
  • Pixel density — 10.60% more. 501 ppi vs 453 ppi.
  • Screen size — 1.02% more. 6.9 " vs 6.83 ".
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 4).
  • Wireless charging: 15 W vs 0 W.

Why Oppo - Reno 13 Pro wins

  • Front camera — 316.67% more. 50 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Wired charging — 77.78% more. 80 W vs 45 W.
  • Weight — 23.00 g less. 195 vs 218.
  • Battery capacity — 16.00% more. 5800 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S25 UltraOppo - Reno 13 Pro
Weight218 g195 glead
Thickness8.2 mm7.55 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S25 UltraOppo - Reno 13 Pro
Screen size6.9 "lead6.83 "
Pixel density501 ppilead453 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2600 nitslead1200 nits

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S25 UltraOppo - Reno 13 Pro
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
AnTuTu2150000lead1430000
CPU total clock21.4 GHzlead15.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S25 UltraOppo - Reno 13 Pro
Main camera200 MPlead50 MP
Front camera12 MP50 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S25 UltraOppo - Reno 13 Pro
Battery capacity5000 mAh5800 mAhlead
Wired charging45 W80 Wlead
Wireless charging15 Wlead0 W

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S25 UltraOppo - Reno 13 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S25 UltraOppo - Reno 13 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates7 yearslead4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy S25 Ultra or Reno 13 Pro?+

Reno 13 Pro has 16.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy S25 Ultra or Reno 13 Pro?+

Reno 13 Pro is 23g lighter — 218g vs 195g.

Is Galaxy S25 Ultra waterproof?+

Galaxy S25 Ultra has an IP68 rating.

Does Reno 13 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, Reno 13 Pro supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy S25 Ultra or Reno 13 Pro?+

Galaxy S25 Ultra has a 200 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.