Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Xiaomi 16 Ultra

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy Z Fold 7SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy Z Fold 7
69.5/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery55· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Xiaomi 16 UltraXIAOMIRENDER
Probe B
Xiaomi
Xiaomi 16 Ultra
74.3/ 100B
Performance81· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Xiaomi 16 Ultra, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 comes out ahead in weight and screen size, while the Xiaomi 16 Ultra wins on wireless charging and wired charging. Overall, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 69.5 and the Xiaomi 16 Ultra scores 74.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Xiaomi 16 Ultra edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.5 vs 74.3), but the 4.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Galaxy Z Fold 7 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, screen size, promised os updates.

Pick the Xiaomi 16 Ultra if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, wired charging, front camera, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, refresh rate, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Samsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7 wins

  • Weight — 14.00 g less. 215 vs 229.
  • Screen size — 12.93% more. 7.6 " vs 6.73 ".
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 5).

Why Xiaomi 16 Ultra wins

  • Wireless charging — 433.33% more. 80 W vs 15 W.
  • Wired charging — 300.00% more. 100 W vs 25 W.
  • Front camera — 220.00% more. 32 MP vs 10 MP.
  • AnTuTu — 43.90% more. 2950000 vs 2050000.
  • Pixel density — 39.57% more. 522 ppi vs 374 ppi.
  • Battery capacity — 36.36% more. 6000 mAh vs 4400 mAh.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Xiaomi 16 Ultra
Weight215 glead229 g
Thickness10.6 mm9.2 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorfoldable_bookleadbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Xiaomi 16 Ultra
Screen size7.6 "lead6.73 "
Pixel density374 ppi522 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2600 nits3200 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Xiaomi 16 Ultra
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
AnTuTu20500002950000lead
CPU total clock21.4 GHz23.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Xiaomi 16 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera10 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Xiaomi 16 Ultra
Battery capacity4400 mAh6000 mAhlead
Wired charging25 W100 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W80 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Xiaomi 16 Ultra
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Xiaomi 16 Ultra
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates7 yearslead5 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?+

Xiaomi 16 Ultra has 36.4% more battery — 4400 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?+

Galaxy Z Fold 7 is 14g lighter — 215g vs 229g.

Is Galaxy Z Fold 7 waterproof?+

Galaxy Z Fold 7 has an IP68 rating.

Does Xiaomi 16 Ultra support 5G?+

Yes, Xiaomi 16 Ultra supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?+

Xiaomi 16 Ultra has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.