Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Honor - 200 Pro vs Oppo - Reno 13 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
200 ProHONORRENDER
Probe A
Honor
200 Pro
66.9/ 100C
Performance64· 25%
Battery65· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Reno 13 ProOPPORENDER
Probe B
Oppo
Reno 13 Pro
68.3/ 100B
Performance62· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display71· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the 200 Pro and Reno 13 Pro, the 200 Pro comes out ahead in wired charging and antutu, while the Reno 13 Pro wins on battery capacity and weight. Overall, the 200 Pro scores 66.9 and the Reno 13 Pro scores 68.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (66.9 vs 68.3). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the 200 Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are wired charging, antutu, pixel density, among others.

Pick the Reno 13 Pro if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are battery capacity, weight, screen size, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, refresh rate, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Honor - 200 Pro wins

  • Wired charging — 25.00% more. 100 W vs 80 W.
  • AnTuTu — 7.69% more. 1540000 vs 1430000.
  • Pixel density — 1.55% more. 460 ppi vs 453 ppi.
  • Wireless charging: 66 W vs 0 W.

Why Oppo - Reno 13 Pro wins

  • Battery capacity — 11.54% more. 5800 mAh vs 5200 mAh.
  • Weight — 4.00 g less. 195 vs 199.
  • Screen size — 0.74% more. 6.83 " vs 6.78 ".
  • Water resistance: IP68 (vs IP65).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecHonor - 200 ProOppo - Reno 13 Pro
Weight199 g195 glead
Thickness8.2 mm7.55 mmlead
Water resistanceIP65IP68lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecHonor - 200 ProOppo - Reno 13 Pro
Screen size6.78 "6.83 "lead
Pixel density460 ppilead453 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4000 nitslead1200 nits

Performance

SpecHonor - 200 ProOppo - Reno 13 Pro
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
AnTuTu1540000lead1430000
CPU total clock16.4 GHzlead15.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecHonor - 200 ProOppo - Reno 13 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera50 MP50 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecHonor - 200 ProOppo - Reno 13 Pro
Battery capacity5200 mAh5800 mAhlead
Wired charging100 Wlead80 W
Wireless charging66 Wlead0 W

Connectivity

SpecHonor - 200 ProOppo - Reno 13 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecHonor - 200 ProOppo - Reno 13 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates4 years4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, 200 Pro or Reno 13 Pro?+

Reno 13 Pro has 11.5% more battery — 5200 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, 200 Pro or Reno 13 Pro?+

Reno 13 Pro is 4g lighter — 199g vs 195g.

Is 200 Pro waterproof?+

200 Pro has an IP65 rating.

Does Reno 13 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, Reno 13 Pro supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, 200 Pro or Reno 13 Pro?+

Reno 13 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.