Between the iPhone 17 Pro and X200, the iPhone 17 Pro comes out ahead in promised os updates, while the X200 wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 17 Pro scores 63.4 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the iPhone 17 Pro if you care most about promised os updates. The biggest gaps in its favor are promised os updates.
Pick the X200 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, battery capacity, among others.
Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Apple - iPhone 17 Pro wins
- ▲Promised OS updates: 6 (vs 4).
Why Vivo - X200 wins
- ▲Wired charging — 200.00% more. 90 W vs 30 W.
- ▲Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- ▲Battery capacity — 57.10% more. 5800 mAh vs 3692 mAh.
- ▲AnTuTu — 25.96% more. 2620000 vs 2080000.
- ▲Wireless charging — 20.00% more. 30 W vs 25 W.
- ▲Screen size — 5.87% more. 6.67 " vs 6.3 ".
- ▲Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
- ▲Weight — 1.00 g less. 202 vs 203.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 203 g | 202 glead |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.0 mmlead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IP68 |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.3 " | 6.67 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2200 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 48 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 3692 mAh | 5800 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 30 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 25 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | iOSlead | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 6 yearslead | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, iPhone 17 Pro or X200?+
X200 has 57.1% more battery — 3692 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, iPhone 17 Pro or X200?+
X200 is 1g lighter — 203g vs 202g.
Is iPhone 17 Pro waterproof?+
iPhone 17 Pro has an IP68 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, iPhone 17 Pro or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.