Between the UltraGear 27GP950-B and ProArt PA32UCXR, the UltraGear 27GP950-B comes out ahead in response time (gtg) and refresh rate, while the ProArt PA32UCXR wins on peak brightness and screen size. Overall, the UltraGear 27GP950-B scores 78.2 and the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UltraGear 27GP950-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.8 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the UltraGear 27GP950-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), refresh rate, g-sync.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, screen size.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, panel type, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the UltraGear 27GP950-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B wins
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 80.00% less. 1 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Refresh rate — 33.33% more. 160 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 166.67% more. 1600 nits vs 600 nits.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 32 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 160 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 1 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 600 nits | 1600 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 3lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | false | truelead |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | — | 96 W |
| KVM | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 27GP950-B or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
UltraGear 27GP950-B refreshes at 160Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, UltraGear 27GP950-B or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
UltraGear 27GP950-B responds in 1ms vs 5ms.
Does UltraGear 27GP950-B or ProArt PA32UCXR have USB-C with power delivery?+
ProArt PA32UCXR offers USB-C with 96W power delivery.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.