vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B vs Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 45GX950A-BLGRENDER
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 45GX950A-B
83.8/ 100A
Performance81· 45%
Panel87· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Studio Display (Nano-textu…APPLERENDER
Probe B
Apple
Studio Display (Nano-texture)
56.1/ 100D
Performance62· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 45GX950A-B and Studio Display (Nano-texture), the UltraGear 45GX950A-B comes out ahead in refresh rate and peak brightness, while the Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins on usb-c power delivery and dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the UltraGear 45GX950A-B scores 83.8 and the Studio Display (Nano-texture) scores 56.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 27.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the UltraGear 45GX950A-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.

Pick the Studio Display (Nano-texture) if you care most about usb-c power delivery and dci-p3 coverage. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, dci-p3 coverage.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B wins

  • ▲Refresh rate — 175.00% more. 165 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • ▲Peak brightness — 116.67% more. 1300 nits vs 600 nits.
  • ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.63% less. 0.03 ms vs 8 ms.
  • ▲Screen size — 66.67% more. 45 " vs 27 ".
  • ▲Has G-Sync.
  • ▲Has FreeSync.
  • ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).

Why Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins

  • ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 6.67% more. 96 W vs 90 W.
  • ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BApple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)
Screen sizeⓘ45 "lead27 "
Panel typeⓘOLEDleadIPS
Resolutionⓘ5K5K
Aspect ratioⓘ21:916:9
Curvedⓘtrueleadfalse

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BApple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)
Refresh rateⓘ165 Hzlead60 Hz
Response time (GtG)ⓘ0.03 mslead8 ms
Peak brightnessⓘ1300 nitslead600 nits
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ98.5 %99 %lead
HDRⓘtrueleadfalse
G-Syncⓘtrueleadfalse
FreeSyncⓘtrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BApple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)
HDMI ports2lead0
DisplayPort ports1lead0
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ90 W96 Wlead
KVMtrueleadfalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 45GX950A-B or Studio Display (Nano-texture)?+

UltraGear 45GX950A-B refreshes at 165Hz vs 60Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 45GX950A-B or Studio Display (Nano-texture)?+

UltraGear 45GX950A-B responds in 0.03ms vs 8ms.

Does UltraGear 45GX950A-B or Studio Display (Nano-texture) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on UltraGear 45GX950A-B, 96W on Studio Display (Nano-texture).

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Aspect ratio→Curved→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→Peak brightness→DCI-P3 coverage→HDR→G-Sync→FreeSync→
By manufacturer

More from the same brands

LG →4
Apple →4

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.