Nothing - Phone (3) vs Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Between the Phone (3) and X Fold 3 Pro, the Phone (3) comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on wireless charging and wired charging. Overall, the Phone (3) scores 68.7 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.
¿Cuál deberías comprar?
The X Fold 3 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.7 vs 73.1), but the 4.4-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Phone (3) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates.
Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, wired charging, ram, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Por qué gana Nothing - Phone (3)
- ▲Weight — 40.00 g less. 196 vs 236.
- ▲Pixel density — 14.43% more. 460 ppi vs 402 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
Por qué gana Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
- ▲Wireless charging — 233.33% more. 50 W vs 15 W.
- ▲Wired charging — 53.85% more. 100 W vs 65 W.
- ▲RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
- ▲Screen size — 19.85% more. 8.03 " vs 6.7 ".
- ▲Battery capacity — 10.68% more. 5700 mAh vs 5150 mAh.
- ▲AnTuTu — 0.98% more. 2070000 vs 2050000.
- ▲Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP68).
Comparación de specs
Design
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 196 glead | 236 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mmlead | 11.2 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IPX8lead |
| Form factor | bar | foldable_booklead |
Display
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.7 " | 8.03 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppilead | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 4500 nits | 4500 nits |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5150 mAh | 5700 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 65 W | 100 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 50 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 5 yearslead | 4 years |
Preguntas frecuentes
Which has better battery, Phone (3) or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has 10.7% more battery — 5150 mAh vs 5700 mAh.
Which is lighter, Phone (3) or X Fold 3 Pro?+
Phone (3) is 40g lighter — 196g vs 236g.
Is Phone (3) waterproof?+
Phone (3) has an IP68 rating.
Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, Phone (3) or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, Phone (3) or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Análisis por spec
Más de las mismas marcas
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.