Between the Phone (3) and X200, the Phone (3) comes out ahead in weight and promised os updates, while the X200 wins on wireless charging and wired charging. Overall, the Phone (3) scores 68.7 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.7 vs 71.7), but the 3.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Phone (3) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, promised os updates, screen size.
Pick the X200 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, wired charging, antutu, among others.
Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, refresh rate, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Nothing - Phone (3) wins
- ▲Weight — 6.00 g less. 196 vs 202.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
- ▲Screen size — 0.45% more. 6.7 " vs 6.67 ".
Why Vivo - X200 wins
- ▲Wireless charging — 100.00% more. 30 W vs 15 W.
- ▲Wired charging — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲AnTuTu — 27.80% more. 2620000 vs 2050000.
- ▲Battery capacity — 12.62% more. 5800 mAh vs 5150 mAh.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 196 glead | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.0 mmlead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IP68 |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.7 "lead | 6.67 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 4500 nits | 4500 nits |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5150 mAh | 5800 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 65 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 5 yearslead | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Phone (3) or X200?+
X200 has 12.6% more battery — 5150 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, Phone (3) or X200?+
Phone (3) is 6g lighter — 196g vs 202g.
Is Phone (3) waterproof?+
Phone (3) has an IP68 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, Phone (3) or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.