Skip to content
vsMars
Cara a cara

Oppo - Reno 13 Pro vs Vivo - X200 Pro

Última actualización · Cómo funciona el Mars Score
Reno 13 ProOPPORENDER
Probe A
Oppo
Reno 13 Pro
68.3/ 100B
Performance62· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display71· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Veredicto rápido

Between the Reno 13 Pro and X200 Pro, the Reno 13 Pro comes out ahead in front camera and weight, while the X200 Pro wins on antutu and ram. Overall, the Reno 13 Pro scores 68.3 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.

Consejo de compra

¿Cuál deberías comprar?

The X200 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.3 vs 74), but the 5.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Reno 13 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are front camera, weight, screen size, among others.

Pick the X200 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are antutu, ram, wired charging, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Por qué gana Oppo - Reno 13 Pro

  • Front camera — 56.25% more. 50 MP vs 32 MP.
  • Weight — 28.00 g less. 195 vs 223.
  • Screen size — 0.74% more. 6.83 " vs 6.78 ".
  • Pixel density — 0.22% more. 453 ppi vs 452 ppi.

Por qué gana Vivo - X200 Pro

  • AnTuTu — 91.61% more. 2740000 vs 1430000.
  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • Wired charging — 12.50% more. 90 W vs 80 W.
  • Battery capacity — 3.45% more. 6000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP68).
  • Wireless charging: 30 W vs 0 W.
Ficha completa

Comparación de specs

Design

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X200 Pro
Weight195 glead223 g
Thickness7.55 mmlead8.5 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP69lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X200 Pro
Screen size6.83 "lead6.78 "
Pixel density453 ppilead452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1200 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X200 Pro
RAM12 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu14300002740000lead
CPU total clock15.4 GHz23.2 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera50 MPlead32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X200 Pro
Battery capacity5800 mAh6000 mAhlead
Wired charging80 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X200 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X200 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates4 years4 years
Preguntas de lectores

Preguntas frecuentes

Which has better battery, Reno 13 Pro or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has 3.4% more battery — 5800 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, Reno 13 Pro or X200 Pro?+

Reno 13 Pro is 28g lighter — 195g vs 223g.

Is Reno 13 Pro waterproof?+

Reno 13 Pro has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Reno 13 Pro or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Reno 13 Pro or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

En detalle

Análisis por spec

Por fabricante

Más de las mismas marcas

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.