Skip to content
vsMars
Face à face

ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW

Dernière mise à jour · Comment fonctionne le Mars Score
ROG Swift PG39WCDMASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
ROG Swift PG39WCDM
79.8/ 100A
Performance84· 45%
Panel75· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
UltraSharp U3825QWDELLRENDER
Probe B
Dell
UltraSharp U3825QW
71.2/ 100B
Performance70· 45%
Panel72· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Verdict rapide

Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and UltraSharp U3825QW, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in peak brightness and refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U3825QW wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the UltraSharp U3825QW scores 71.2 on our Mars Score.

Conseil d’achat

Lequel choisir ?

The ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.

Pick the UltraSharp U3825QW if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.

Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Pourquoi ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM gagne

  • Peak brightness — 188.89% more. 1300 nits vs 450 nits.
  • Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
  • Screen size — 4.00% more. 39 " vs 37.5 ".
  • Has G-Sync.
  • Has FreeSync.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).

Pourquoi Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW gagne

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 55.56% more. 140 W vs 90 W.
Fiche complète

Comparaison des specs

Panel

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMDell - UltraSharp U3825QW
Screen size39 "lead37.5 "
Panel typeQD-OLEDleadIPS
Resolution1440p4Klead
Aspect ratio21:921:9
Curvedtruetrue

Performance

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMDell - UltraSharp U3825QW
Refresh rate240 Hzlead120 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 mslead5 ms
Peak brightness1300 nitslead450 nits
DCI-P3 coverage99 %99 %
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMDell - UltraSharp U3825QW
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery90 W140 Wlead
KVMtruetrue
Questions des lecteurs

Questions fréquentes

Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraSharp U3825QW?+

ROG Swift PG39WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.

Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraSharp U3825QW?+

ROG Swift PG39WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.

Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraSharp U3825QW have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 140W on UltraSharp U3825QW.

En détail

Analyses spec par spec

Par fabricant

Plus des mêmes marques

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.