Between the Pulsefire Haste 2 and EC1-CW, the Pulsefire Haste 2 comes out ahead in max dpi and polling rate, while the EC1-CW wins on wireless and battery. Overall, the Pulsefire Haste 2 scores 84.6 and the EC1-CW scores 54.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Pulsefire Haste 2 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 29.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Pulsefire Haste 2 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are max dpi, polling rate, weight, among others.
Pick the EC1-CW if you care most about wireless and battery. Its strongest claims are wireless, battery.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Pulsefire Haste 2 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 wins
- ▲Max DPI — 712.50% more. 26000 vs 3200.
- ▲Polling rate — 700.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 1000 Hz.
- ▲Weight — 16.00 g less. 61 vs 77.
- ▲Buttons — 1.00 more. 6 vs 5.
Why BenQ - EC1-CW wins
- ▲Wireless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 70 h vs 0 h.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | BenQ - EC1-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000lead | 3200 |
| Max IPS | 650lead | 400 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hzlead | 1000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | BenQ - EC1-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 61 glead | 77 g |
| Buttons | 6lead | 5 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Right-handed |
Connectivity
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | BenQ - EC1-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | false | truelead |
| Battery | 0 h | 70 hlead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.