Skip to content
vsMars
Spec drill · Min focal

RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM vs 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art

A side-by-side readout for min focal.

Canon · RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
100mm
▲ Lead
Sigma · 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art
35mm
VerdictRF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM wins on min focal.
Context

Understanding min focal

Min focal is a numeric spec measured in mm. On this metric, higher values are generally better, but returns diminish past category-typical thresholds — going from a low value to a mid value usually matters far more than going from a mid value to a high one. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs min focal together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

This matchupRF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM's 100mm is roughly 186% higher than 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art's 35mm (a 65mm gap). Whether that gap is noticeable depends on workload — small percentage gaps rarely change day-to-day experience, while gaps of 20% or more usually do.

Drill more

Other specs on this comparison

See the full Camera Lenses category for all products ranked by Mars Score.