Skip to content
vsMars
Spec drill · Response time (GtG)

OMEN 32q QHD vs UltraGear 27GX790A-B

A side-by-side readout for response time (gtg).

HP · OMEN 32q QHD
1ms
LG · UltraGear 27GX790A-B
0.03ms
▲ Lead
VerdictUltraGear 27GX790A-B wins on response time (gtg).
Context

Understanding response time (gtg)

Response time (GtG) is a numeric spec measured in ms. On this metric, lower values are generally better — smaller, lighter, thinner, or less demanding usually translates to a more comfortable or more efficient product. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs response time (gtg) together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

This matchupOMEN 32q QHD's 1ms is roughly 3233% more than UltraGear 27GX790A-B's 0.03ms (a 0.97ms gap). Lower is better here, so UltraGear 27GX790A-B takes the lead in real use.

Drill more

Other specs on this comparison

See the full Monitors category for all products ranked by Mars Score.