Between the Sprocket Portable Photo Printer and Instax Wide Evo, the Sprocket Portable Photo Printer comes out ahead in film format, while the Instax Wide Evo wins on double exposure. Overall, the Sprocket Portable Photo Printer scores 95 and the Instax Wide Evo scores 69.4 on our Mars Score.
どちらを買うべき?
The Sprocket Portable Photo Printer is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 25.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Sprocket Portable Photo Printer if you care most about film format. The biggest gaps in its favor are film format.
Pick the Instax Wide Evo if you care most about double exposure. Its strongest claims are double exposure.
Both ship with comparable hybrid (digital + print), so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Sprocket Portable Photo Printer is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
HP - Sprocket Portable Photo Printerが勝つ理由
- ▲Film format: ZINK (vs Instax wide).
Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evoが勝つ理由
- ▲Has Double exposure.
スペック比較
Film
| スペック | HP - Sprocket Portable Photo Printer | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | ZINKlead | Instax wide |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | true | true |
Features
| スペック | HP - Sprocket Portable Photo Printer | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | false | false |
| Double exposure | false | truelead |
| Lens count | 0 | 1lead |
Design
| スペック | HP - Sprocket Portable Photo Printer | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 180 glead | 490 g |
スペック詳細分析
同じブランドの他の製品
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.