Between the Instax mini Evo and Lomo'Instant Automat Glass, the Instax mini Evo comes out ahead in hybrid (digital + print), while the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass wins on several specs. Overall, the Instax mini Evo scores 91.4 and the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass scores 75 on our Mars Score.
どちらを買うべき?
The Instax mini Evo is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 16.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Instax mini Evo if you care most about hybrid (digital + print). The biggest gaps in its favor are hybrid (digital + print).
The Lomo'Instant Automat Glass similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable film format, double exposure, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Instax mini Evo is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Fujifilm - Instax mini Evoが勝つ理由
- ▲Has Hybrid (digital + print).
Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glassが勝つ理由
- No decisive advantages.
スペック比較
Film
| スペック | Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | Instax mini | Instax mini |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | truelead | false |
Features
| スペック | Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | false | truelead |
| Double exposure | true | true |
| Lens count | 1 | 3lead |
Design
| スペック | Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 285 glead | 440 g |
スペック詳細分析
同じブランドの他の製品
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.