Between the Triflex HX2 and Detect Pro Cordless IW1511, the Triflex HX2 comes out ahead in suction (aw), while the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins on dustbin and weight. Overall, the Triflex HX2 scores 71.9 and the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 scores 69.5 on our Mars Score.
どちらを買うべき?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (71.9 vs 69.5). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Triflex HX2 if you care most about suction (aw). The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw).
Pick the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are dustbin, weight.
Both ship with comparable battery, cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Miele - Triflex HX2が勝つ理由
- ▲Suction (AW) — 5.88% more. 180 vs 170.
Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511が勝つ理由
- ▲Dustbin — 40.00% more. 0.7 L vs 0.5 L.
- ▲Weight — 0.20 kg less. 3.7 vs 3.9.
スペック比較
Performance
| スペック | Miele - Triflex HX2 | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 180lead | 170 |
| Dustbin | 0.5 L | 0.7 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| スペック | Miele - Triflex HX2 | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.9 kg | 3.7 kglead |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |
スペック詳細分析
同じブランドの他の製品
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.