Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

64 Audio - U12t vs Etymotic - ER4XR

Last updated · How Mars Score works
U12t64 AUDIORENDER
Probe A
64 Audio
U12t
79.3/ 100A
Drivers79· 70%
Build· 30%
ER4XRETYMOTICRENDER
Probe B
Etymotic
ER4XR
39.7/ 100D
Drivers40· 70%
Build· 30%
Quick verdict

Between the U12t and ER4XR, the U12t comes out ahead in impedance and sensitivity, while the ER4XR wins on several specs. Overall, the U12t scores 79.3 and the ER4XR scores 39.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The U12t is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 39.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the U12t if you care most about impedance and sensitivity. The biggest gaps in its favor are impedance, sensitivity, driver count.

The ER4XR similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.

Both ship with comparable detachable cable, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the U12t is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why 64 Audio - U12t wins

  • Impedance — 33.00 Ω less. 12 vs 45.
  • Sensitivity — 17.35% more. 115 dB vs 98 dB.
  • Driver count — 11.00 more. 12 vs 1.

Why Etymotic - ER4XR wins

  • No decisive advantages.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Drivers

Spec64 Audio - U12tEtymotic - ER4XR
Driver count12lead1
Driver types12 Balanced ArmatureBalanced Armature
Impedance12 Ωlead45 Ω
Sensitivity115 dBlead98 dB

Build

Spec64 Audio - U12tEtymotic - ER4XR
Detachable cabletruetrue
Connector2-pinleadMMCX
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.