Between the Nebula Mars 3 and W5800, the Nebula Mars 3 comes out ahead in several specs, while the W5800 wins on brightness and resolution. Overall, the Nebula Mars 3 scores 46.5 and the W5800 scores 73.9 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The W5800 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 27.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
The Nebula Mars 3 doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the W5800 if you care most about brightness and resolution. Its strongest claims are brightness, resolution.
Both ship with comparable light source, short-throw, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the W5800 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Anker - Nebula Mars 3 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why BenQ - W5800 wins
- ▲Brightness — 160.00% more. 2600 lm vs 1000 lm.
- ▲Resolution: 4K (vs 1080p).
Spec comparison
Image
| Spec | Anker - Nebula Mars 3 | BenQ - W5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Resolutionⓘ | 1080p | 4Klead |
| Brightness | 1000 lm | 2600 lmlead |
| Contrast | 1500:1 | 2000000:1 |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Short-throw | false | false |
Smart & Connectivity
| Spec | Anker - Nebula Mars 3 | BenQ - W5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Smart OS | Android TV | None |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2lead |
| Built-in speakers | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.