Between the EQ14 and NucBox M6, the EQ14 comes out ahead in tdp and volume, while the NucBox M6 wins on storage. Overall, the EQ14 scores 67.4 and the NucBox M6 scores 67.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (67.4 vs 67.1). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the EQ14 if you care most about tdp and volume. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, volume.
Pick the NucBox M6 if you care most about storage. Its strongest claims are storage.
Both ship with comparable ram, thunderbolt, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Beelink - EQ14 wins
- ▲TDP — 30.00 W less. 15 vs 45.
- ▲Volume — 0.15 L less. 0.4 vs 0.55.
Why GMKtec - NucBox M6 wins
- ▲Storage — 2.40% more. 512 GB vs 500 GB.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - EQ14 | GMKtec - NucBox M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.4 Llead | 0.55 L |
| Weight | 0.45 kglead | 0.55 kg |
| TDPⓘ | 15 Wlead | 45 W |
| USB ports | 5lead | 4 |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.