Between the PIXMA TR8620a and WorkForce Pro WF-7840, the PIXMA TR8620a comes out ahead in several specs, while the WorkForce Pro WF-7840 wins on pages/min (mono) and pages/min (color). Overall, the PIXMA TR8620a scores 49.1 and the WorkForce Pro WF-7840 scores 60.4 on our Mars Score.
어느 것을 사야 할까요?
The WorkForce Pro WF-7840 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 11.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
The PIXMA TR8620a doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the WorkForce Pro WF-7840 if you care most about pages/min (mono) and pages/min (color). Its strongest claims are pages/min (mono), pages/min (color).
Both ship with comparable type, color, auto duplex, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the WorkForce Pro WF-7840 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Canon - PIXMA TR8620a이(가) 이기는 이유
- No decisive advantages.
Epson - WorkForce Pro WF-7840이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Pages/min (mono) — 66.67% more. 25 vs 15.
- ▲Pages/min (color) — 20.00% more. 12 vs 10.
사양 비교
Spec
| 사양 | Canon - PIXMA TR8620a | Epson - WorkForce Pro WF-7840 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Inkjet AIO | Inkjet AIO |
| Color | true | true |
| Pages/min (mono) | 15 | 25lead |
| Pages/min (color) | 10 | 12lead |
| Resolution | 4800x1200 dpi | 4800x2400 dpi |
| Max paper size | Letter | Tabloidlead |
Features
| 사양 | Canon - PIXMA TR8620a | Epson - WorkForce Pro WF-7840 |
|---|---|---|
| Auto duplex | true | true |
| ADF | true | true |
| Wi-Fi | true | true |
| AirPrint | true | true |
사양별 심층 분석
같은 브랜드의 더 보기
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.