Between the MX500 1TB and 870 EVO 1TB, the MX500 1TB comes out ahead in several specs, while the 870 EVO 1TB wins on endurance (tbw) and sequential write. Overall, the MX500 1TB scores 43.5 and the 870 EVO 1TB scores 43.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes, with the decision sitting on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
The MX500 1TB doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the 870 EVO 1TB if you care most about endurance (tbw) and sequential write. Its strongest claims are endurance (tbw), sequential write.
Both ship with comparable capacity, sequential read, interface, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Crucial - MX500 1TB wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Samsung - 870 EVO 1TB wins
- ▲Endurance (TBW) — 66.67% more. 600 vs 360.
- ▲Sequential write — 3.92% more. 530 MB/s vs 510 MB/s.
Spec comparison
Capacity
| Spec | Crucial - MX500 1TB | Samsung - 870 EVO 1TB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1000 GB | 1000 GB |
Performance
| Spec | Crucial - MX500 1TB | Samsung - 870 EVO 1TB |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential read | 560 MB/s | 560 MB/s |
| Sequential write | 510 MB/s | 530 MB/slead |
| Interface | SATA III | SATA III |
| Form factor | 2.5" SATA | 2.5" SATA |
Endurance
| Spec | Crucial - MX500 1TB | Samsung - 870 EVO 1TB |
|---|---|---|
| Endurance (TBW)ⓘ | 360 | 600lead |
| Warranty | 5 yrs | 5 yrs |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.