Between the EcoTank ET-5850 and Xpress C1810W, the EcoTank ET-5850 comes out ahead in pages/min (color) and pages/min (mono), while the Xpress C1810W wins on several specs. Overall, the EcoTank ET-5850 scores 60.4 and the Xpress C1810W scores 52.6 on our Mars Score.
어느 것을 사야 할까요?
The EcoTank ET-5850 edges ahead on the Mars Score (60.4 vs 52.6), but the 7.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the EcoTank ET-5850 if you care most about pages/min (color) and pages/min (mono). The biggest gaps in its favor are pages/min (color), pages/min (mono), adf.
The Xpress C1810W similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable color, auto duplex, airprint, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the EcoTank ET-5850 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Epson - EcoTank ET-5850이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Pages/min (color) — 200.00% more. 12 vs 4.
- ▲Pages/min (mono) — 38.89% more. 25 vs 18.
- ▲Has ADF.
Samsung - Xpress C1810W이(가) 이기는 이유
- No decisive advantages.
사양 비교
Spec
| 사양 | Epson - EcoTank ET-5850 | Samsung - Xpress C1810W |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Inkjet AIO | Laser (color) |
| Color | true | true |
| Pages/min (mono) | 25lead | 18 |
| Pages/min (color) | 12lead | 4 |
| Resolution | 4800x1200 dpi | 9600x600 dpi |
| Max paper size | Letter | Letter |
Features
| 사양 | Epson - EcoTank ET-5850 | Samsung - Xpress C1810W |
|---|---|---|
| Auto duplex | true | true |
| ADF | truelead | false |
| Wi-Fi | true | true |
| AirPrint | true | true |
사양별 심층 분석
같은 브랜드의 더 보기
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.