Between the ULX and Pulsefire Haste 2, the ULX comes out ahead in weight and wireless, while the Pulsefire Haste 2 wins on polling rate. Overall, the ULX scores 81.5 and the Pulsefire Haste 2 scores 84.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Pulsefire Haste 2 edges ahead on the Mars Score (81.5 vs 84.6), but the 3.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the ULX if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, wireless, battery.
Pick the Pulsefire Haste 2 if you care most about polling rate. Its strongest claims are polling rate.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Finalmouse - ULX wins
- ▲Weight — 22.00 g less. 39 vs 61.
- ▲Wireless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 100 h vs 0 h.
Why HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 wins
- ▲Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 39 glead | 61 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | truelead | false |
| Battery | 100 hlead | 0 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.