Between the X-T5 and Z f, the X-T5 comes out ahead in weight and megapixels, while the Z f wins on sensor size. Overall, the X-T5 scores 57.7 and the Z f scores 46 on our Mars Score.
어느 것을 사야 할까요?
The X-T5 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 11.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the X-T5 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, megapixels, af points, among others.
Pick the Z f if you care most about sensor size. Its strongest claims are sensor size.
Both ship with comparable in-body stabilization, log profile, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X-T5 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Fujifilm - X-T5이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Weight — 153.00 g less. 557 vs 710.
- ▲Megapixels — 66.67% more. 40 MP vs 24 MP.
- ▲AF points — 42.14% more. 425 vs 299.
- ▲Max video: 6K (vs 4K60).
Nikon - Z f이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Sensor size: Full Frame (vs APS-C).
사양 비교
Sensor
| 사양 | Fujifilm - X-T5 | Nikon - Z f |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | APS-C | Full Framelead |
| Megapixels | 40 MPlead | 24 MP |
| Max ISO | 51200 | 64000lead |
Video
| 사양 | Fujifilm - X-T5 | Nikon - Z f |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 6Klead | 4K60 |
| RAW video | false | false |
| Log profileⓘ | true | true |
Autofocus
| 사양 | Fujifilm - X-T5 | Nikon - Z f |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 425lead | 299 |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Body & Controls
| 사양 | Fujifilm - X-T5 | Nikon - Z f |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 557 glead | 710 g |
| Weather sealedⓘ | true | true |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | truelead | false |
사양별 심층 분석
같은 브랜드의 더 보기
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.