Between the Classic Evo Pro and 3300 LatteGo, the Classic Evo Pro comes out ahead in warm-up, while the 3300 LatteGo wins on built-in grinder and type. Overall, the Classic Evo Pro scores 76.1 and the 3300 LatteGo scores 69.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Classic Evo Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (76.1 vs 69.4), but the 6.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Classic Evo Pro if you care most about warm-up. The biggest gaps in its favor are warm-up.
Pick the 3300 LatteGo if you care most about built-in grinder and type. Its strongest claims are built-in grinder, type.
Both ship with comparable pressure, milk frother, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Classic Evo Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Gaggia - Classic Evo Pro wins
- ▲Warm-up — 10.00 s less. 30 vs 40.
Why Philips - 3300 LatteGo wins
- ▲Has Built-in grinder.
- ▲Type: Super-automatic (vs Semi-automatic espresso).
Spec comparison
Brewing
| Spec | Gaggia - Classic Evo Pro | Philips - 3300 LatteGo |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Semi-automatic espresso | Super-automaticlead |
| Pressure | 15 bar | 15 bar |
| Milk frother | true | true |
| Built-in grinder | false | truelead |
Capacity & Power
| Spec | Gaggia - Classic Evo Pro | Philips - 3300 LatteGo |
|---|---|---|
| Water tank | 2.1 Llead | 1.8 L |
| Wattage | 1200 W | 1500 Wlead |
| Warm-up | 30 slead | 40 s |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.