Between the Forerunner 265 and Pacer Pro, the Forerunner 265 comes out ahead in smartwatch mode and multi-band gps, while the Pacer Pro wins on gps mode. Overall, the Forerunner 265 scores 42.8 and the Pacer Pro scores 39.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Forerunner 265 edges ahead on the Mars Score (42.8 vs 39.7), but the 3.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Forerunner 265 if you care most about smartwatch mode and multi-band gps. The biggest gaps in its favor are smartwatch mode, multi-band gps.
Pick the Pacer Pro if you care most about gps mode. Its strongest claims are gps mode.
Both ship with comparable solar charging, ecg, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Garmin - Forerunner 265 wins
- ▲Smartwatch mode — 85.71% more. 13 days vs 7 days.
- ▲Has Multi-band GPS.
Why Polar - Pacer Pro wins
- ▲GPS mode — 45.83% more. 35 h vs 24 h.
Spec comparison
GPS & Sensors
| Spec | Garmin - Forerunner 265 | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-band GPS | truelead | false |
| Barometric altimeter | false | truelead |
| Heart rate | true | true |
| ECG | false | false |
| Pulse Ox | truelead | false |
Battery
| Spec | Garmin - Forerunner 265 | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Smartwatch mode | 13 dayslead | 7 days |
| GPS mode | 24 h | 35 hlead |
| Solar charging | false | false |
Design
| Spec | Garmin - Forerunner 265 | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46 mmlead | 45 mm |
| Weight | 47 g | 41 glead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.