Between the HPA300 and 5500-2, the HPA300 comes out ahead in coverage and cadr, while the 5500-2 wins on min noise. Overall, the HPA300 scores 65 and the 5500-2 scores 56.9 on our Mars Score.
어느 것을 사야 할까요?
The HPA300 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the HPA300 if you care most about coverage and cadr. The biggest gaps in its favor are coverage, cadr, true hepa h13+.
Pick the 5500-2 if you care most about min noise. Its strongest claims are min noise.
Both ship with comparable activated carbon, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the HPA300 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Honeywell - HPA300이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Coverage — 33.33% more. 44 m² vs 33 m².
- ▲CADR — 22.89% more. 510 m³/h vs 415 m³/h.
- ▲Has True HEPA H13+.
Winix - 5500-2이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Min noise — 5.00 dB less. 27 vs 32.
사양 비교
Performance
| 사양 | Honeywell - HPA300 | Winix - 5500-2 |
|---|---|---|
| CADR | 510 m³/hlead | 415 m³/h |
| Coverage | 44 m²lead | 33 m² |
| True HEPA H13+ | truelead | false |
| Activated carbon | true | true |
Smart & Noise
| 사양 | Honeywell - HPA300 | Winix - 5500-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Min noise | 32 dB | 27 dBlead |
| Air quality sensor | false | truelead |
| Smart app | false | false |
사양별 심층 분석
같은 브랜드의 더 보기
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.