Between the G Pro X Superlight 2 and X2V3, the G Pro X Superlight 2 comes out ahead in several specs, while the X2V3 wins on polling rate and battery. Overall, the G Pro X Superlight 2 scores 74.4 and the X2V3 scores 87.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2V3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 13.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
The G Pro X Superlight 2 doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the X2V3 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are polling rate, battery, weight, among others.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, wireless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X2V3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Pulsar - X2V3 wins
- ▲Polling rate — 300.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 2000 Hz.
- ▲Battery — 26.32% more. 120 h vs 95 h.
- ▲Weight — 5.00 g less. 55 vs 60.
- ▲Buttons — 1.00 more. 6 vs 5.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 32000 | 32000 |
| Max IPS | 500 | 750lead |
| Polling rate | 2000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 60 g | 55 glead |
| Buttons | 5 | 6lead |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 95 h | 120 hlead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.