Between the Triflex HX2 and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the Triflex HX2 comes out ahead in suction (aw), while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on dustbin and weight. Overall, the Triflex HX2 scores 71.9 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (71.9 vs 70.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Triflex HX2 if you care most about suction (aw). The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw).
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are dustbin, weight.
Both ship with comparable battery, cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Miele - Triflex HX2 wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 2.86% more. 180 vs 175.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Dustbin — 40.00% more. 0.7 L vs 0.5 L.
- ▲Weight — 0.40 kg less. 3.5 vs 3.9.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Miele - Triflex HX2 | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 180lead | 175 |
| Dustbin | 0.5 L | 0.7 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Miele - Triflex HX2 | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.9 kg | 3.5 kglead |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.