ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)
Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and Gram Pro 17 (2024), the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in refresh rate, while the Gram Pro 17 (2024) wins on cpu cores and claimed battery life. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the Gram Pro 17 (2024) scores 73.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Gram Pro 17 (2024) edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 73.5), but the 3.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate.
Pick the Gram Pro 17 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are cpu cores, claimed battery life, screen size, among others.
Both ship with comparable ram, storage, battery, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 14.58% more. 165 Hz vs 144 Hz.
Why LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024) wins
- ▲CPU cores — 100.00% more. 16 vs 8.
- ▲Claimed battery life — 80.00% more. 18 h vs 10 h.
- ▲Screen size — 6.25% more. 17 " vs 16 ".
- ▲Thunderbolt ports — 2.00 more. 2 vs 0.
- ▲Weight — 0.71 kg less. 1.49 vs 2.2.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) | LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.49 kglead |
| Thickness | 26.9 mm | 12.4 mmlead |
| Build material | plastic | magnesium |
| Backlit keyboard | true | true |
| Fingerprint reader | false | truelead |
Display
| Spec | ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) | LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 16 " | 17 "lead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 165 Hzlead | 144 Hz |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | IPS |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) | LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16lead |
| GPUⓘ | AMD Radeon RX 7700S | NVIDIA RTX 3050 Laptop |
| RAMⓘ | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storageⓘ | 1024 GB | 1024 GB |
| Storage typeⓘ | SSD | SSD |
Battery & Ports
| Spec | ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) | LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Batteryⓘ | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Claimed battery life | 10 h | 18 hlead |
| USB-C ports | 2lead | 1 |
| Thunderbolt portsⓘ | 0 | 2lead |
| HDMI | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Gram Pro 17 (2024)?+
Gram Pro 17 (2024) claims up to 18 hours — 10h vs 18h.
Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Gram Pro 17 (2024)?+
Gram Pro 17 (2024) is lighter at 1.49 kg vs 2.2 kg.
Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Gram Pro 17 (2024)?+
Neither model has an OLED display.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.