Bang & Olufsen - Beosound Explore vs Marshall - Stockwell III
Between the Beosound Explore and Stockwell III, the Beosound Explore comes out ahead in output power and water resistance, while the Stockwell III wins on low-end response. Overall, the Beosound Explore scores 70.3 and the Stockwell III scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Beosound Explore edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.3 vs 65.3), but the 5.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Beosound Explore if you care most about output power and water resistance. The biggest gaps in its favor are output power, water resistance.
Pick the Stockwell III if you care most about low-end response. Its strongest claims are low-end response.
Both ship with comparable battery, stereo pairing, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Beosound Explore is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Bang & Olufsen - Beosound Explore wins
- ▲Output power — 100.00% more. 60 W vs 30 W.
- ▲Water resistance: IP67 (vs IPX4).
Why Marshall - Stockwell III wins
- ▲Low-end response — 10.00 Hz less. 50 vs 60.
Spec comparison
Audio
| Spec | Bang & Olufsen - Beosound Explore | Marshall - Stockwell III |
|---|---|---|
| Output power | 60 Wlead | 30 W |
| Low-end response | 60 Hz | 50 Hzlead |
| Stereo pairing | true | true |
Durability
| Spec | Bang & Olufsen - Beosound Explore | Marshall - Stockwell III |
|---|---|---|
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP67lead | IPX4 |
| Weight | 631 glead | 1390 g |
Battery
| Spec | Bang & Olufsen - Beosound Explore | Marshall - Stockwell III |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 27 h | 27 h |
| USB out (powerbank) | false | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.