Between the EQ14 and Mac Studio M4 Max, the EQ14 comes out ahead in tdp and volume, while the Mac Studio M4 Max wins on ram and storage. Overall, the EQ14 scores 67.4 and the Mac Studio M4 Max scores 47.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The EQ14 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 20.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the EQ14 if you care most about tdp and volume. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, volume.
Pick the Mac Studio M4 Max if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are ram, storage, thunderbolt.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the EQ14 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Beelink - EQ14 wins
- ▲TDP — 165.00 W less. 15 vs 180.
- ▲Volume — 3.30 L less. 0.4 vs 3.7.
Why Apple - Mac Studio M4 Max wins
- ▲RAM — 125.00% more. 36 GB vs 16 GB.
- ▲Storage — 2.40% more. 512 GB vs 500 GB.
- ▲Has Thunderbolt.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - EQ14 | Apple - Mac Studio M4 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.4 Llead | 3.7 L |
| Weight | 0.45 kglead | 2.74 kg |
| TDPⓘ | 15 Wlead | 180 W |
| USB ports | 5 | 6lead |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.