Between the X-T5 and α6700, the X-T5 comes out ahead in megapixels and max video, while the α6700 wins on af points and weight. Overall, the X-T5 scores 57.7 and the α6700 scores 47.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X-T5 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 10.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the X-T5 if you care most about megapixels and max video. The biggest gaps in its favor are megapixels, max video.
Pick the α6700 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are af points, weight.
Both ship with comparable sensor size, in-body stabilization, log profile, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X-T5 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Fujifilm - X-T5 wins
- ▲Megapixels — 53.85% more. 40 MP vs 26 MP.
- ▲Max video: 6K (vs 4K120).
Why Sony - α6700 wins
- ▲AF points — 78.59% more. 759 vs 425.
- ▲Weight — 64.00 g less. 493 vs 557.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Fujifilm - X-T5 | Sony - α6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | APS-C | APS-C |
| Megapixels | 40 MPlead | 26 MP |
| Max ISO | 51200lead | 32000 |
Video
| Spec | Fujifilm - X-T5 | Sony - α6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 6Klead | 4K120 |
| RAW video | false | false |
| Log profileⓘ | true | true |
Autofocus
| Spec | Fujifilm - X-T5 | Sony - α6700 |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 425 | 759lead |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Fujifilm - X-T5 | Sony - α6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 557 g | 493 glead |
| Weather sealedⓘ | true | true |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | truelead | false |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.